-

ABOUT US SUBSCRIBE WRITE TO US ADVERTISE ARCHIVES/SEARCH

Email:
Subscribe
Unsubscribe
 
Home > Management > Full Story Print this Page|  Email this page

New data confirm CEO pay decline

Leaders of major US corporations pocketed smaller pay packages last year than at any time since 1989, reports a survey on CEO salaries

Reduction in the remuneration of CEOs mirrors similar slumps in many companies’ fortunes, according to an analysis of 100 concerns’ latest proxy statements by New York pay consultants William M Mercer. Salaries and bonuses of surveyed chief executives dropped a median of 2.9% to $1.24 million. That is largely because 59 companies slashed or omitted their leaders’ bonuses, which often are linked to profitability. Corporate profits sank a median of 13%, the Mercer study found.

Meanwhile, the CEOs’ median total direct compensation fell 10.2% to $2.16 million. That includes salary, bonuses, gains from stock-option exercises, long-term incentive payouts and the value of restricted stock at the time of grant. The decreases mark the first such declines in the 12 years of big-business chiefs.

The Mercer analysis, mainly covered corporations whose fiscal 2001 ended before December 31. In the wake of Enron Corp’s collapse last December, heads of certain underperforming concerns have come under considerable attack for making big bucks while their investors and rank-and-file employees suffered. The new Mercer study suggests this phenomenon may be less widespread than popularly believed.

“As the companies that didn’t perform well, the CEOs got significant cuts,” observed Peter Chingos, head of Mercer’s US compensation practice in New York. “The relation between pay and performance is pronounced,” he continued. “This is the tightest relationship we’ve ever seen.” Thus, he noted, the significant fall in chief executives’ total direct compensation “is very much a function of the (depressed) stock market.”

Equally important, Chingos added, are signs that the moderating pay trend continues. Take option awards, for instance. CEOs in the new study got a median of 250,000 options with a face value of $7.2 million. (Face value is computed by multiplying the number of options by the market price at the time of the grant.) That is up slightly from a median of 207,100 options with the same $7.2 million value awarded the 350 chiefs covered in the prior year’s complete survey. The findings show that corporate boards aren’t substituting options for business leaders’ missed or diminished bonuses, Chingos observed. The Mercer analysis revealed no evidence of damped enthusiasm for so-called megagrants of options, however. An option megagrant has a face value of at least eight times an individual’s salary and bonus. About 28% or 24 of the 85 businesses bestowing options last year handed out the hefty helpings. By comparison, 22% (or 68 of 306 concerns) did so in the year-earlier full study.

Despite megagrants’ increased prevalence, truly whopping ones have become less common, Mercer analyst Steve Sabow reported. “You’re not seeing every other company granting options (worth) 80 times annual compensation,” he said.
---www.hrhub.com

<Back to top>

Front Page || People || Working Abroad || Management || Careers

© Copyright 2000: Indian Express Group (Mumbai, India). All rights reserved throughout the world. This entire site is compiled in
Mumbai by The Business Publications Division of the Indian Express Group of Newspapers.
Please contact our Webmaster for any queries on this site.